Hi everyone! I have posted the audio recording of our October 2007 Membership Teleconference call to the Meeting archives page. Be sure to download the handouts to use while listening to the audio recording. We had a highly motivating technical program about concision and clarity and the need to reduce the number of words that we use to communicate our technical information.
I posted both a WAV file and an MP3 file. Our audio guru who edits our recordings created a higher quality, but larger file, in the WAV file. He also created the smaller MP3 file, but its quality is noticably different. So, my question to you all is this: Is 52 MB too large of a file, or does quality always trump file size when working with an audio recording of a meeting? (Please be patient as you wait for the WAV file to download, as it will take some time, even over a T1 or fast DSL line.)
|1.||Advanced registration deadline for Summit 2015 on May 31, 2015 12:00am EDT|
|2.||When is Video the Answer (and When Isn't It)? on June 04, 2015 03:00pm EDT|
|3.||Monthly Volunteer Meeting on June 11, 2015 11:30am EDT|
|4.||Summit 2015 on June 21, 2015|
|5.||Final day to apply for our Technical Communication scholarship! on July 01, 2015|